News · From the live show

Rubén Uría on VAR: when should it actually be used?

A panellist hits back that with VAR in 2016, Atlético would have a European Cup

From the live showKOKE Y CARDOSO BAJAS PARA VALENCIA | RDP DE SIMEONE | EL MADRILEÑO SE LA JUEGA | #ClubUria972At 1:18:25Video in Spanish

The panel debates which incidents VAR should step in on

Rubén Uría would restrict VAR to ghost goals, horror tackles and offside. On the panel, he is challenged with an argument every Atleti fan will recognise.

Rubén Uría sets out his model: VAR in just three situations. First, goal-line technology, which he finds astonishing that LaLiga still lacks well into the 21st century. Second, genuinely horrifying tackles, studs into the knee. Third, offside, no matter whether it is by a centimetre.

One panellist rejects the premise outright. He recalls how many offside robberies there have been and believes VAR has brought football closer to justice. His clinching argument: had there been VAR in 2016, Atlético would have a European Cup. He admits that as a spectator he feels safer with VAR, perhaps because he supports Atleti.

VARgoal-line technologyoffsideAtlético de Madrid2016 Champions League final
KOKE Y CARDOSO BAJAS PARA VALENCIA | RDP DE SIMEONE | EL MADRILEÑO SE LA JUEGA | #ClubUria972The full live show this story comes from, aired on 30 Oct 2026.
Watch the moment

Translated from the original Spanish story.